Wednesday, 23 January 2013

Fraud for one, fraud for all

Lance Armstrong's belated confession stands as a perfect example not of a confession, but how long he managed to continue (about 15 years) without failing a SINGLE drug test, not by being clean but by cheating the tests as well as the races.

This type of performance can ONLY happen where an entire group is corrupt, from the TOP downwards, as 'rogue individuals' nearly always get busted, prosecuted and held up as an example outside their company or profession. But in cycling and banking (I have enough evidence on both of those at the very least) the rogue individuals are the honest ones. There is not a single reason to cheat or join the crooks as a new and innocent arrival, but they nearly all did, and if a single person genuinely thinks one profession has 'more crooks' than others that is exactly why they get away with it so long, as YOU believe say, scientists are generally far more trustworthy than politicians or estate agents.

How the bloody hell do you know that? Does someone studying science need to have an ethics test before they are accepted as well as good A levels? Are somehow technically minded people more pure of heart than those in business? NO!!! People are people first, and the law of averages sorts the good, bad and indifferent virtually exactly evenly EVERYWHERE, whatever the destination they are virtually the same mix.

Therefore if one particular area becomes poisoned, then whether they are the small group of leaders or large group of silent followers who know exactly what happens and keeps them protected by keeping quiet, they have gone bad. Libor, Hillsbrough, Enron, Bernie Madoff, all appeared above suspicion, so the longer they stayed in business the more money or avoidance of prosecution could continue. Lance Armstrong was not a rogue individual, he was just the most successful cheat in history in a profession of other cheats. Now we know this please accept this can and does happen in every possible profession, the signs are the same for all, I spent many years learning them and if everyone else does they will get stopped before they have cleared up and screwed us all in the process. Knowledge is the only requirement to undo every single one.

Wednesday, 16 January 2013

Basic temperature rise for doublings of CO2

Temp  rise from 1850 C'

With no positive feedback, double CO2 and add a degree C. In 2013 CO2 has increased 50% since 1850, temperature has risen around 0.7C on a rising trend, and even if all down to CO2 double that and you get a barely noticeable 1.5C at 520ppm. But if you can squeeze 1.5C at 520ppm, you would need 1040ppm for 2C plus any feedback, and 2080 for 3C etc. There isn't even enough fossil fuel available to burn that much to raise temperatures past anywhere near the IPCC 'danger level', the experiment for the feedback is already half run and by their own figures, they attribute only 0.4C to the added CO2, meaning this graph is actually reading higher than reality so far. How many activists or the general public realise even if CO2 reaches 520ppm, once there it would be almost impossible to gain much more heat as the return would reduce so much the emissions would not be able to keep up. The IPCC don't mention that but it is first year stuff for the scientists.

Friday, 11 January 2013

Mass hysteria, you ain't seen nothing yet

Throughout history the medically recognised phenomenon of mass hysteria has broken out in larger and smaller examples, the greatest known probably being the Salem witch trials. The common elements are a group possession of a psychotic delusion, which all within believe to be genuine while all unaffected can see the same way as with an individual's psychotic ramblings. Religion may be argued as another example as if you remove the source as Jesus or Moses many of the claims would also be considered equal nonsense, but for this piece religion is used solely to demonstrate the psychological mechanisms involved.

Up till the 1990s, there was no known non-religious example which was not either local or small scale and short lived. But with the effort of Al Gore who with James Hansen made a speech to Congress to the tune that by 2100 we'd all die of heatstroke unless we stopped burning fossil fuels, even though at the time the temperature had only risen around half a degree in over a century, they managed to convince the majority of the world this was true, despite it breaking every single rule of logic and evidence, namely:

Temperature rise. Whether or not the temperatures were accurate or complete, even their worst case scenario of 0.7C in 150 years around the turn of the century was normally something insignificant. But because CO2 had risen in the same period by 50% you had an unknown entered into the atmosphere, one which those capable could claim more or less whatever they wanted as long as they had the required status. Then they shifted from the meagre temperature rises, as although CO2 appeared to have shot up (although only measured at one point on the planet) the actual present effects were very close to the 1C expected by doubling. My original thought was 'doubling from what point?', but it's not a linear doubling but a logarithmic one, ie each doubling is half as powerful as the last, fast becoming infinitesimal in response to impossible potential octupling or so. So we have a lab/paper figure of doubling adding 1C, borne out perfectly by the 0.7 rise less natural causes at 50%.

However, breaking the rules of reality and crossing over into end times and Revelations, they switched from logic and science to Nostradamus and astrology. If CO2 rises to 560ppm by 2100 the temperature could rise up to 6C (but most likely 2-3C). This was despite the foreseen water vapour being evaporated to cause more humidity and amplify the warming, which as no built in delay went into the equation, has not happened half way through the experiment. So take away today's lack of news, and direct people's attention to a puzzle with no solution, as back in the 90s only a few people born around that time would be alive to see it in 2100. 2050, the new 2100, is little different as none of the existing scientists will be under 80 when it comes along, and if they really think it's reasonable to wait till most observers are dead to even get a clue of the end result they should be retired and left to grass.

Sea level rise: Global warming (you know, that cause which was the driver of the effect of climate change) requires (according to the UN) a rise of 2C before any negative overall results kick in, till then the overall obvious results (just like the results of an ice age are obvious, even those living near the equator can probably find a chest freezer somewhere they can stand by for a bit to get the feel) of greater food production and fewer overall deaths from cold are possibly overturned by whatever (unknown) disadvantages could be. I say unknown as history isn't quite sure about temperatures before 1850 as no one measured them enough to know till then. But we do know it was warmer in Roman times and biblical as it's agreed in general, and there were no reports of climate wars or mass extinctions they'd like us to. So the sea level rise is only an effect of a vastly rising temperature, as sea records are far easier to look back on as the shells on dry land show it was once covered by sea, and they can all be carbon dated. Half sea level rise is from thermal expansion, and half is from melting polar land ice. Last century the sea rose 7 inches (which even the Pacific islanders were directly unaware of unless they looked it up) with a temperature rise of around half a degree, and in 2013 the little percentage of the new century we've passed is consistent with that, especially considering the the temperature settled down just before 2000 so how could the sea rise faster? Therefore James Hansen's claims of a metre, or metres by 2100 is impossible. Not impossible just to know either way, but would require a known volume of sea to expand and ice to melt, which (someone can help me as it's not my bag) requires from my basic enquiries around 6C. Given the known drivers and progress of the existing CO2/temperature line, sea level has to follow as entirely linked and dependent on temperature to rise.

So, given the two extremely simple criteria, temperature and sea level past, present and future, and timescales presented for the future and equations for CO2/temperature relationships compared with results, what would a child think? Of course a child who wasn't taught Al Gore's national curriculum, but one independent of any prior persuasion.If I had the time and resources I'd draw up a paper test and get a few hundred children to take it, but gentlemen of the jury, given the situation, you easily have the means to put yourself in such a position and make a perfectly adequate estimation.

Believing an experiment half run (50% CO2 rise) could still suddenly turn the other way, creating a rise at least if not above the highest estimated possible temperature of the UN, which given just the most basics of science could see the drivers of such a rise would be physically impossible unless naturally coming out of an ice age, is a symptom of temporary mental inadequacy. Mass persuasion, hysteria, brainwashing, exploitation and selective reporting has created what is the greatest level of mass delusion ever. Unfortunately within the literature there is no clue as to how to dismantle the problem, as each went away on its own. Sufferers are the mental patients or drunks at the party while the immune recessive minority are the visitors or sober ones. If anyone's attempted to use their logic and awareness of reality to a schizophrenic patient they will know the two cannot meet, and this is what we're up against here until something happens to either break it suddenly (only such major new data or one of the authority figures changing the message) or gradually, which will then take decades of flat or falling temperatures to leave all but the irrelevant minority behind. Of course every day it continues we are all losing money and freedom, Paris and London have banned certain older vehicles already from entering, and this is just the start of such measures including David Miliband's wish for a personal energy ration, only put on hold as he lost the last election. Not to mention the 3,000 people dying every winter in Britain from hypothermia since energy prices were raised too high for them to afford.

Unfortunately whichever way you play it out this mass hysteria is gradually becoming mass murder, while vast amounts of food crops are being burnt as biofuel, reducing the availability in the third world and raising the price in the developed world. Waiting 30 years for the facts to overtake the lunacy will hurt far too many people and by then the damage will all be done.


10 examples of mass hysteria

Wednesday, 9 January 2013

2013's climate crackers

It's January the 10th, and we've had:

The Hebrew University summary of climate data showing no significant warming or human influence

The Met Office revising their decadal guess prediction horoscope projection to complete two decades with no warming worldwide.

NASA releasing the results of a massive study showing solar changes do in fact have a far greater effect on climate than thought.

One (the Met Office) has been reported widely, although released on 24th of December, a vigorous campaign by the GWPF (Nigel Lawson's outfit) meant an eventual release yesterday worldwide. The university study, by far the most important, was missed entirely, despite including and contradicting the fully reported BEST report earlier in the year by Berkeley University. NASA only reported today and to be fair is so obscure to the average person is almost guaranteed to be kept to the internet. But we have three continents almost simultaneously confirming what informed skeptics with and without scientific qualifications have been saying for years. Will the rest of the world now start to catch up?

More climate quotes

“I am ashamed of what climate science has become today,” The science “community is relying on an inadequate model to blame CO2 and innocent citizens for global warming in order to generate funding and to gain attention. If this is what ‘science’ has become today, I, as a scientist, am ashamed…Science is too important for our society to be misused in the way it has been done within the Climate Science Community.” Swedish Climatologist Dr. Hans Jelbring,

“Global warming is the central tenet of this new belief system in much the same way that the Resurrection is the central tenet of Christianity.… My skepticism about AGW arises from the fact that as a physicist who has worked in closely related areas, I know how poor the underlying science is. In effect the scientific method has been abandoned in this field.” — Atmospheric Physicist Dr. John Reid, who worked with Australia’s CSIRO’s (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization) Division of Oceanography and worked in surface gravity waves (ocean waves) research.

“We’re not scientifically there yet. Despite what you may have heard in the media, there is nothing like a consensus of scientific opinion that this is a problem. Because there is natural variability in the weather, you cannot statistically know for another 150 years.” — UN IPCC’s Tom Tripp, a member of the UN IPCC and listed as one of the lead authors and serves as the Director of Technical Services & Development for U.S. Magnesium

“Any reasonable scientific analysis must conclude the basic theory wrong!!”— NASA Scientist Dr. Leonard Weinstein who worked 35 years at the NASA Langley Research Center and finished his career there as a Senior Research Scientist. Weinstein, is presently a Senior Research Fellow at the National Institute of Aerospace.

“Those who call themselves ‘Green planet advocates’ should be arguing for a CO2- fertilized atmosphere, not a CO2-starved atmosphere…Diversity increases when the planet was warm AND had high CO2 atmospheric content…Al Gore’s personal behavior supports a green planet – his enormous energy use with his 4 homes and his bizjet, does indeed help make the planet greener. Kudos, Al for doing your part to save the planet.” — Renowned engineer and aviation/space pioneer Burt Rutan, who was named “100 most influential people in the world, 2004 by Time Magazine and Newsweek called him “the man responsible for more innovations in modern aviation than any living engineer.”

“Please remain calm: The Earth will heal itself — Climate is beyond our power to control…Earth doesn’t care about governments or their legislation. You can’t find much actual global warming in present-day weather observations. Climate change is a matter of geologic time, something that the earth routinely does on its own without asking anyone’s permission or explaining itself.” — Nobel Prize-Winning Stanford University Physicist Dr. Robert B. Laughlin, who won the Nobel Prize for physics in 1998, and was formerly a research scientist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

“The energy mankind generates is so small compared to that overall energy budget that it simply cannot affect the climate…The planet’s climate is doing its own thing, but we cannot pinpoint significant trends in changes to it because it dates back millions of years while the study of it began only recently. We are children of the Sun; we simply lack data to draw the proper conclusions.” — Russian Scientist Dr. Anatoly Levitin, the head of geomagnetic variations laboratory at the Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radiowave Propagation of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

“Hundreds of billion dollars have been wasted with the attempt of imposing a Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) theory that is not supported by physical world evidences…AGW has been forcefully imposed by means of a barrage of scare stories and indoctrination that begins in the elementary school textbooks.” — Brazilian Geologist Geraldo LuĂ­s Lino, who authored the 2009 book “The Global Warming Fraud: How a Natural Phenomenon Was Converted into a False World Emergency.”

“We maintain there is no reason whatsoever to worry about man-made climate change, because there is no evidence whatsoever that such a thing is happening.” — Greek Earth scientists Antonis Christofides and Nikos Mamassis of the National Technical University of Athens’ Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering.

“There are clear cycles during which both temperature and salinity rise and fall. These cycles are related to solar activity…In my opinion and that of our institute, the problems connected to the current stage of warming are being exaggerated. What we are dealing with is not a global warming of the atmosphere or of the oceans.” — Biologist Pavel Makarevich of the Biological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences

“Because the greenhouse effect is temporary rather than permanent, predictions of significant global warming in the 21st century by IPCC are not supported by the data.” — Hebrew University Professor Dr. Michael Beenstock an honorary fellow with Institute for Economic Affairs who published a study challenging man-made global warming claims titled “Polynomial Cointegration Tests of the Anthropogenic Theory of Global Warming.”

“The whole idea of anthropogenic global warming is completely unfounded. There appears to have been money gained by Michael Mann, Al Gore and UN IPCC’s Rajendra Pachauri as a consequence of this deception, so it’s fraud.” — South African astrophysicist Hilton Ratcliffe, a member of the Astronomical Society of Southern Africa (ASSA) and the Astronomical Society of the Pacific and a Fellow of the British Institute of Physics.

Monday, 7 January 2013

Elements of historic extremism in 21st century politics

Comparison with modern political agendas with historic totalitarianism: (work in progress)

'Public Relations' Goebbels is the modern father of propaganda-which has currently become political correctness- make discussion of sacred cows impossible and insult or criminalise any opposition eg gay marriage 'homophobic' global warming 'murderer' immigration 'racist'. Closing down opposition by personal slander is the lowest means of propagandism, and used to treat opinions (such as gay marriage and immigration) or two sided issues (global warming) as if they were facts. Change the meanings of words and create new ones, such as 'pollution' (CO2 is essential for life and not toxic up to around 5% [from a current 0.4%]) 'carbon footprint', 'renewables', 'clean energy' etc. In fact the UN have a paper recommending replacing the term 'climate change' (a meaningless phrase cut from the entire 'climate change from global warming') to the equally meaningless 'sustainability' as people are beginning to notice it is incorrect.

World government and policies: While sold as the best way to govern in an international age, in fact the agenda is no different from any other empire building, it just raises the world as the highest prize. The EU and UN have taken up this mission following the loss by Germany/Axis powers in the last two world wars, to regain a unified control of Europe, and in the case of the UN, the entire world. Being fully open with such policies (as they either believe they are right, or else the people will) plans for a world government, requiring a tax based on energy usage and carbon currency, which both require a world tier to be operable, are being proposed.

Scapegoating: As we all need warmth to live and to travel, everyone requires a minimum amount of heating, electricity and fuel. By demonising the sources of nearly all such power, and as a consequence the users, we have the ultimate scapegoat, humanity. 'Charities' such as WWF and Greenpeace have extremist wings who compare humans with vermin, maggots and cancer. David Suzuki and Margaret Mead were the modern voices for the movement, with many more coming on board from an original meeting in the 70s onwards, along with the Club of the Isles, including Prince Philip who wants to be reincarnated as a deadly virus. This was not ironic or a joke.

Travel restrictions: What was the first thing the Soviet government did to its people? It created travel permits and made it almost impossible to leave the country, let alone emigrate. The EU have plans to ban cars in all major cities, with London banning old commercial vehicles and Paris all older vehicles in 2012, under ultimately UN Agenda 21 directives (not binding) via ICLEI who administer Agenda 21 locally. Artificially raising fuel and public transport prices further make it harder to work far from home and the London Congestion Charge which divides families as some cannot afford to leave their children with relatives in the school holidays.

Historic policies: At present there is no single version of older types of extreme and totalitarian policies, most theories but some carried out completely or partially, but a mixture and rebirth of elements of old and new movements, the details are not important as generally dead, but as a whole need to be known in order to recognise in current forms and versions, which have been heavily disguised in PR newspeak you need a translator to uncover their true meanings. I have already covered the travel restrictions and deliberate neologisms to repeat until people forget they were ever not part of the language, despite having little or no meaning. A general belief in collectivism, and that individuals are not responsible enough to govern themselves is inherent at both ends of the political spectrum, along with individual wealth which is believed by many to be an obscenity and goes against equality. Redistribution of wealth, and enforced restrictions on it are the feature of all on the left, the only difference being how much. Some disagree with inheritance, returning all assets to the state on death, regardless of the fact that would also require a restriction on gifts during the childrens' lifetimes (or technically gifts over a certain size to anyone) otherwise the law could not be enforceable.

The general claims by all extremists is people need a firm hand and must work together or certain policies such as farming or climate must be coordinated at extra-national levels or cannot work. This of course has no basis in reality as countries such as Iceland, Switzerland and Norway have absolutely no trouble carrying out their governments and cooperating with others while the EU would rather force countries such as Greece to raise the value of their currencies to keep the collective going via the Euro currency.

Scapegoating comes in all shapes and forms, to Jews and Non-Aryans, to polluters, the rich, the aristocracy or anyone else to divert attention from the bloody mess the government has made as in fact they always have ultimate control of individuals and organisations so blaming others is a smokescreen. The banks, however, have become the false messiahs of the 21st century, as whatever they do in Britain they cannot lose, while in Iceland they did default, face prosecution, and as a result although their foreign debts were welched on the country is out of recession unlike the EU. Protecting friends and relatives is the opposite side of scapegoating, so if the far left say a terrorist organisation like Hamas is good, and ban Israeli goods (despite many employees being Arabs) they are protecting and promoting murderers. Hamas have always fired on the innocent while Israel has never fired a single shot first against them. But the PLO and all onwards teach the children Jews and Christians are pigs and dogs and must be wiped out from what they call 'Palestine' as they refuse to accept the (UN created) state of Israel. This is just the best current example of turning a terrorist criminal organisation into heroes as they support the greater agenda.

I have already listed many quotes already so will allow the reader to check them directly, and search for the endless supply on the internets from greats as Stalin, Lenin, Mao and similar, but will say they are divided in two, direct statements of genuine policy, and doublespeak where good is bad and up is down, and just need translating by those who know.

Grand designs: From the ongoing Soviet five and ten year plans which never seemed to be completed, to the dream of a united Europe, many political organisations have such stereotyped desires to take over a continent, and now the world, including the Muslim Global Caliphate, who work in Muslim and non-Muslim countries attempting the dual purpose of returning every country with a Muslim population since day one (including Spain), and wiping out Israel. Whether or not any or all of such desires had been carried out, they are all there to be seen and represent both the genuine beliefs and aims of some of the richest and most powerful people in history and the present, including the quote from David Rockefeller's autobiography. Many are willing to kill to complete their missions, human life is always secondary to the mission at the worst level of extremism, and seen since Genesis onwards. Denying such deaths, including the Turkish massacre of Armenians and the holocaust itself, both within living memory, are part of the PR, and rewriting history is another classical policy of totalitarian governments. The current argument of Mary Seacole being forced into the national curriculum as a nursing heroine, despite being unqualified and running business in war zones against Florence Nightingale is a recent British example designed to promote the false philosophies of multiculturalism and universalism, claiming all cultures are equal and those who hurt or kill their own people (even when in this country) are somehow excused from any responsibility as it is 'their culture'. The fact suttee and thugee, killing and robbing with violence, were successfully eliminated from India by the British Empire, killing female children there and in China, and female genital mutilation are generally avoided by all western authorities, either pretending it doesn't even happen, or allowing it as part of an alternative culture.

In the end all such people use moral relativism, claiming no action they deem qualifies is any worse than any other. What follows is legislation to restrict freedom of speech, coined to deceive by using terms like 'Preventing racism' or 'Equality', while simply making certain words or phrases illegal.

Conclusions: The aims of the mad and the bad, who have enough power and/or money to carry out at least some of their wishes, have barely changed since the bible, as people have never changed. As long as enough people with such power abuse it by bending the rules to favour themselves and their friends, whether or not it is sheer brainwashing and a genuine belief in the cause or simply purely corrupt, the results are the same. In fact, all top politicians and philosophers have concluded it is a waste of energy to try and analyse the motivations of the enemy as much as trying to follow the ramblings of a schizophrenic. If they are against us then all we can do is recognise it and organise our own forces to stop them taking over. Extremists rely on a combination of brainwashing, raising the awareness of the majority to believe their claims, or subterfuge, by pretending they are helping you when cutting your throats. Simply recognising both is the best vaccine, and should a single country be educated well enough to see the elements they can never take hold.